Developing economies call for global action to contain risks
Volatile capital flows, foreign exchange pressures and higher borrowing costs have buffeted emerging markets as major economies have begun rolling back the very low interest rates that have prevailed since the 2008 global financial crisis.
Thus, concern over rising risks to emerging market economies were centre stage at the ongoing yearly meetings of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank Group (WBG), as global Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors also gathered in Bali, Indonesia for the biannual Ministerial Meeting of the Group of Twenty-Four (G-24) developing countries.
The Group of 24, of which Nigeria is a member, is a chapter of the G-77, was established in 1971, to coordinate the positions of developing countries on international monetary and development finance issues and to ensure that their interests were adequately represented in negotiations on international monetary matters.
Speaking on the external pressure, Minister of Finance and Media, Sri Lanka, and Chairman of the G-24, Mangala Samaraweera, said: “Global growth continues broadly but risks are rising for developing economies with higher oil prices, rising interest rates, high debt levels and the threat of trade war as top concerns. We urge major powers to reform and reinforce rather than discard the rules-based global trading system.”
“There is no avoiding the fact that the market for capital is global, which means policies and interest rates in advanced economies affect emerging and developing economies,” said Julio Velarde, first vice-chair of the G-24 and Governor of the Central Reserve Bank of Peru.
“Emerging markets that restrain debt levels and maintain prudent macroeconomic policies may weather volatility better, but all emerging markets are adversely affected by excessive capital flow volatility,” Velarde said.Accordingly, G-24 and IMF/World Bank delegates discussed debt vulnerabilities that are rising in some developing countries, particularly low-income countries. According to the IMF, debt as a percentage of GDP has risen from 33 percent to 47 percent in the last five years for low-income countries.
“Such a rapid rise in debt and rates should be a concern to both creditors and debtors, which share a responsibility to foster debt transparency and sustainability,” Samaraweera said.In the context of recurring volatility, there are multilateral actions that could mitigate this damage to developing countries.
The G-24 reiterated the importance of a strong Global Financial Safety Net, with an adequately resourced, quota-based IMF at its centre, which has the resources needed to act decisively when needed. One-third of the IMF’s lending resources will disappear next year when bilateral financing arrangements expire. Delegates therefore reiterated that it is important that IMF surveillance continues an even-handed and context-based assessment of macro-prudential and capital flow management measures, affording countries the latitude to implement appropriate measures to ensure financial stability.
Consequently, G-24 delegates agreed on a number of key measures to deal with the interrelated challenges of growth and debt, including:
Trade uncertainties and financial and monetary conditions compound rising debt vulnerabilities. Improving debt sustainability depends on a supportive external trade and financial environment, timely contingency financing and the adequate flow of concessional financing for low income countries (LICs), which has been down by almost 20 per cent compared to 2013 to 2016 figures. Continued action from the IMF, WBG, and multilateral partners, and donors on capacity building for fiscal and debt management and sustainability and debt transparency.
Recognising of the issue, and improving transparency around borrowing, as both borrowers and lenders are responsible for ensuring sustainability. Acknowledging that with greater reliance on market-based finance, the challenges of maintaining debt sustainability and resolving sovereign debt crises evolve, and the need for a better framework to deal with such challenges.